Paper Details

AuthorsZeqi Lai, Qian Wu, Hewu Li, Mingyang Lv, Jianping Wu
Conference2021 IEEE 29th International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP)
doi10.1109/ICNP52444.2021.9651919

Summary

Proposes a similar thing to what petar talked about in the first meeting, where we both use groundstations, relay satellites and LEO mega-constellations.

Focuses mainly on routing:

Proposes to use location based addressing instead of ip-adressing, meaning the address of the satellite changes over time.

General Thoughts

Might be a good paper to site if we want to comment on the routing aspect of getting data down.

Edit note


Annotations

Highlight ColorMeaning
RedAim to Improve
YellowNeutral comments
GreenAim to replicate
BlueFurther Reading
  • “very low latency include disaster management and emergency response (e.g., for floods, fires and earthquakes), forecasting for extreme weather conditions, remote monitoring and security (e.g., maritime smuggling/rescue, illegal fishing) and defense, where the EO data is only useful if it is successfully delivered in a very short time period [56].” Page
    • applications
    • Missions which would benefit from new downlink
  • “free-space LEO→GEO laser links can achieve up…to 1.8Gbps [72] datarate,” Page - metric for leo to geo laser link
  • “approach is still limited by the GEO→ground path with the speed less than 300Mbps. Moreover, the supported number of user-spacecrafts per GEO satellite relay is very limited (e.g., only 2 per GEO relay in TDRS [64]).” Page 2
    • GEO,relay
    • Challenges of GEO relay satellites
  • “to drive the simulation of LEO constellation, and emulate network software stack and traffic based on Mininet [11].” Page 2
  • “In particular, the average daily traffic generated by NASA’s EO system is about 27.9TB [60]. The present EO archive in European Space Agency (ESA) has exceeded 3 PB and it is foreseen that this volume will exceed 10 PB in few years [59].” Page 2
  • “low-latency, as the latency in above time-sensitive scenarios is expected to approach 1 minute or at least less than 5 minutes in particular [56];” Page 3
  • “(e.g., the per-satellite cost of Starlink is below $500K [20])” Page 4
  • “Specifically, we use ITU-Rpy [9] to simulate the impact of weather conditions on the atmospheric attenuation in slant and horizontal paths.” Page 8
  • “For each constellation, we follow a well-known +Grid topology [29], [43], [51] to interconnect each satellite, i.e., each satellite has at least five laser ISLs, two of which are connected to the two neighborhoods in the same orbit, and other two links are connected to the” Page 8
    • further_reading,FSO
    • For this paper the mega-constellation satellites have 5 FSO links. Maybe look into how many oneweb and starlink have